The old team is gone
There is a repository, but little context, weak documentation, unclear access, and no clear release process.
Custom software audit
FRAI reviews existing software, old repositories, deployments, integrations, hosting, and documentation before deciding whether to maintain, modernize, migrate, or rebuild.
The audit is for companies that already have software in production, but no longer know if it can be trusted, changed, or maintained.
There is a repository, but little context, weak documentation, unclear access, and no clear release process.
Dependencies are old, integrations are fragile, hosting is unclear, and every change feels risky.
The company asks for maintenance, but the first question is whether the system can be recovered and controlled.
The audit is not a long report for its own sake. It tells us what can be kept, fixed, moved, or rebuilt.
Repository, branches, dependencies, build process, and deployment notes
Hosting, domains, SSL, credentials, logs, alerts, backups, and recovery
Database structure, data flows, integrations, APIs, forms, and automations
Security risks, access control, exposed secrets, outdated packages, and missing controls
Documentation, release process, ownership gaps, and maintenance workload
What can be kept, what should be fixed, and what should be rebuilt
After the audit, FRAI says which path fits the system: maintain it, recover it first, or rebuild the parts that are too risky.
The system is clear enough to bring under FRAI control and start maintenance.
The system can be recovered, but needs dependency work, deployment fixes, hosting changes, documentation, or integration cleanup first.
The codebase is too risky, undocumented, insecure, or blocked by old choices. The safer path is to rebuild the critical flows.
The boundary
FRAI audits existing software to decide whether it can be run safely. We do not accept blind deployment work for third-party repositories. If FRAI cannot understand and control the system, we will not maintain it as it is.
These questions usually come up when a company has an old system, an external repository, or a software supplier that is no longer available.
Yes. FRAI can review the repository, dependencies, deployment, hosting, integrations, data flows, documentation, and security risks before deciding the next step.
Yes, if the audit shows that the system can be brought under FRAI technical control. If not, the first step is stabilization, modernization, migration, or rebuild.
No. Blind deployment of a third-party repository is too risky. FRAI only deploys and maintains software it understands and can run safely.
FRAI will say so. If the repository is too risky or broken, the next step is to rebuild or migrate the critical flows instead of maintaining a weak base.
It depends on system size, repository access, hosting, integrations, data, and documentation. FRAI defines the audit scope before starting.
If the system can be recovered, it moves into maintenance. If it cannot, the next step is a focused rebuild.